Friday 20 February 2009

The Troubles comes to Upper Cheltenham Place

The police ticketing of vehicles extends to more than just one taxi making it hard for passing cars, they have also visited the pavement of Upper Cheltenham Place.

This van T138RTA will go down in history as a vehicle to get a ticket purely for completely blocking the pavement of a quiet back road.

Where else is there to park a van in this area?

Similarly, the golf M554KAA which is always positioned here now gets to pay £30 for the right -a number which, amusingly, is not that far off the proposed annual residents parking fee had the area voted to become an RPZ.

It is going to be interesting to go by next week, next month, to see if there's been any change in driver behaviour, or whether it is an aberration.

Meanwhile, over in Brislington, residents are requesting police enforcement of parking and yellow-hatched-junctions. This is a dangerous trend.

2 comments:

  1. I like the way you included a cyclist in each of those three pics. Did three come along at once or is it always busy with cyclists?

    I suppose since people in Montpelier would have to walk in the road anyway they might as well cycle. Perhaps surreptitiously giving the pavements over to parking is part of Bristol's Cycling City strategy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's the quietest way from Gloucester road to ashley hill, though heading in that direction you need to contraflow lower Cheltenham place, or do a steep uphill to Cobourg Road. I didn't have to wait long for bikes, so just timed the pics right -though I didnt get the camera strap out the way of one photo -annoying.

    ReplyDelete

Commenters MUST NOT post spam, MUST NOT post requests for cross linking and MUST NOT post up requests for paid links. Such attempts SHALL result in one or more postings in which we MAY be rude or we MAY make fun of you and MAY include your public email address. Furthermore, we MAY report you to google for attempts at paid linking, who SHALL then punish your site.

Comments are closed after two days -after that they are moderated. You MUST be logged in to post.

This statement follows RFC2119 rules regarding the use of MUST, MUST NOT, MAY, and SHALL and MUST be treated as normative.