Monday 11 October 2010

Dear Evening Post Editorial Staff....


We've been reading about your obsession with tax-dodging cyclists riding on pavements for a while now. Okay, so we know it's illegal. So is driving and parking on the pavement. Take a look at the picture above - you may be familiar with the building in shot. We have a very simple question for you:

Is driving and parking on the pavement more or less risky than riding a bicycle on it?.

If you think it's a greater risk (heaven forbid that a pedestrian might get knocked over by one of those cars perpetually tucked into the side of your building), then why not write a series of articles about the dangers of 'paveparking' in your publication?.
at

1 comment:

  1. Unknown13 Oct 2010, 07:42:00

    Having logged on to read my daily dose of anti-bike propaganda which is Thisisbristol.co.uk , I was surprised and somewhat dismayed to see an article that seemed to be highlighting the apparent 'benefits' of cycling.

    http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/big-push-people-cycling/article-2750610-detail/article.html

    It took me a while to work it out but I think it is a trick to kill off any weak-minded readers.

    ReplyDelete

Commenters MUST NOT post spam, MUST NOT post requests for cross linking and MUST NOT post up requests for paid links. Such attempts SHALL result in one or more postings in which we MAY be rude or we MAY make fun of you and MAY include your public email address. Furthermore, we MAY report you to google for attempts at paid linking, who SHALL then punish your site.

Comments are closed after two days -after that they are moderated. You MUST be logged in to post.

This statement follows RFC2119 rules regarding the use of MUST, MUST NOT, MAY, and SHALL and MUST be treated as normative.