Hello
I'm the cyclist the driver of your van VE08NKX chose to overtake on a blind corner on Belmont Hill, Somerset, at 15:46 on 25 November.
I'm the cyclist who shouted a warning to your driver that there was an oncoming car —a warning he chose to ignore:
And I'm the cyclist who videoed your van nearly hitting the oncoming car.
That car braked to avoid a collision, incidentally, and we both waved an acknowledgement to each other of how close it had been.
I've not got in touch before; I was waiting to see how Avon and Somerset Police were going to respond to the complaint that I'd filed online with them. As the time limit for them to file a Notice of Impending Prosecution has expired and they are yet to get in touch, the answer is: nothing.
Your driver has to consider themselves lucky to have not only avoided a head-on collision with an oncoming vehicle, but to avoid any form of punishment from the police for nearly doing so. That is despite the irrefutable video evidence showing them ignoring a shouted warning and overtaking where they had no visibility. If A&S Police were to adopt the prosecute-on-video-evidence policy which the Central Midlands Police are now operating, they would now be facing a choice between prosecution to Dangerous Driving or pleading guilty to the lesser offence of Careless Driving.
As it is: no prosecution, no pleading, no penalty, no points on their license, and no insurance premium.
That fact reflects as badly on our local police as it does on your employee.
Given the police's utter inaction, you can report to your driver that this particular near-crash won't result in any prosecution.
However, you do need to consider your brand tainted. It's clear from your website that you take site safety as seriously as it needs to be —but it's also clear from the video that your staff are treating off site safety with utter disdain. This driver endangered other road users in a van with your business name and telephone number painted on three sides of the vehicle, making identifying this employer trivial. The more incidents like this, the more videos of your drivers will go online, the more that safety theme gets devalued.
Please: tell your driver that in a world of helmet cameras and dashcams —the era of "getting away" with dangerous driving is over. If they drive dangerously in their free time, it is only the lives of themselves and others and their own driving license which they endanger. When they do it in company vehicles, it is your vehicles they are also threatening, your insurance premiums they are risking, and your brand that they are destroying,
Showing posts with label Avon and Somerset Police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Avon and Somerset Police. Show all posts
Saturday, 17 December 2016
Monday, 28 November 2016
Grass a driver week: MK59USB, texting across a junction
Apparently some police forces in the country are now rolling out enforcement of driving too close to tax dodgers, maybe even section 59 ASB orders, which are interesting as there is a lower burden of proof. It doesn't impact penalties or insurance, simply threatens to take the car away.
We watch these experiments with trepidation.
Meanwhile, Bristol has a page to report incidents for their records alone.
This week we are conducting a small experiment to report a few dangerous drivers to this site, to see what happens. Expect followups if there are any results.
First, MK59USB on Tyndall's Park Road, crossing Whiteladies Road while reading their phone.
There are now pedestrian crossing lights on some of the arms of the junctions, specifically Tyndall's Park Road has a walk and ike one (a small dip in the kerb allows the bikes over); Whiteladies Road inbound also has green. These require left-turns to be restricted, which has long been a rule more ignored than observed. The council has recently done some raised corner sharpening; be interesting to see what's happening.
Where there is not any pedestrian crossing is on St Pauls Road —the Clifton Side— people run across when there is a gap, such as when vehicles heading inbound are waiting to turn right, and in that little gap between Whiteladies Road going read and TPR/St Pauls Road going green.
Which means this mercedes is about to head towards a junction where there are likely to be people sprinting across. Will they put down their phone?
No, is the answer, they keep on looking at it, going down to one-handed so they can hold the steering wheel with the other. About half way through the junction, they look up, notice the cyclist, and hold the phone down out of sight.
Interesting question: what would have happened if the tax-dodger hadn't been there?
The experiment begins, then, by filing this on the A&S police site, see how they react.
What about the full report an incident process? Too much hassle given its inevitable that nothing is going to happen. If they don't act when you go to the station with a CD of a video and a complaint, it's unlikely that they will react to a youtube URL.
We watch these experiments with trepidation.
Meanwhile, Bristol has a page to report incidents for their records alone.
This week we are conducting a small experiment to report a few dangerous drivers to this site, to see what happens. Expect followups if there are any results.
First, MK59USB on Tyndall's Park Road, crossing Whiteladies Road while reading their phone.
There are now pedestrian crossing lights on some of the arms of the junctions, specifically Tyndall's Park Road has a walk and ike one (a small dip in the kerb allows the bikes over); Whiteladies Road inbound also has green. These require left-turns to be restricted, which has long been a rule more ignored than observed. The council has recently done some raised corner sharpening; be interesting to see what's happening.
Where there is not any pedestrian crossing is on St Pauls Road —the Clifton Side— people run across when there is a gap, such as when vehicles heading inbound are waiting to turn right, and in that little gap between Whiteladies Road going read and TPR/St Pauls Road going green.
Which means this mercedes is about to head towards a junction where there are likely to be people sprinting across. Will they put down their phone?
No, is the answer, they keep on looking at it, going down to one-handed so they can hold the steering wheel with the other. About half way through the junction, they look up, notice the cyclist, and hold the phone down out of sight.
Interesting question: what would have happened if the tax-dodger hadn't been there?
The experiment begins, then, by filing this on the A&S police site, see how they react.
What about the full report an incident process? Too much hassle given its inevitable that nothing is going to happen. If they don't act when you go to the station with a CD of a video and a complaint, it's unlikely that they will react to a youtube URL.
Wednesday, 11 July 2012
Police Tactics
Good to see the Police are employing people to help discourage cycling in Bristol. Especially trying to discourage those travelling with children onboard their bicycle for the school run (as was the case in this video submitted by S via our East Bristol franchise). The TSD Fleet Support vehicle WX11EWN is a van that is registered as an Avon and Somerset Police Force vehicle and even shows up as part of proud collection of vehicles on Flickr if you Google "TSD Fleet Support Flickr".
Visit the videos Youtube page for full info at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwpkhDdHOpY
Visit the videos Youtube page for full info at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwpkhDdHOpY
Labels:
Avon and Somerset Police,
bad-overtaking,
Bristol,
children,
overtaking,
police,
Rodney-Road,
Speedwell,
van,
WX11EWN
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)